Effects on Strategy Development of Including Relative Performance Information in Incentive Scheme
Timothy Charles Miller
Xavier University - Department of Accountancy
W. Timothy Mitchell
University of Waterloo
Sean A. Peffer
University of Kentucky - Gatton College of Business and Economics
January 11, 2012
Strategy development is important in complex, multi-period tasks, as it likely improves long-term performance. Firms commonly either provide Relative Performance Information (RPI) or contract on RPI to improve performance. However, we know little about how the different uses of RPI affect strategy development. We investigate how providing RPI vs. contracting on RPI affects strategy development in complex, multi-period tasks with short-term incentives. The results of our experiment show that only providing RPI reduces strategy development, as participants direct more of their current-period effort toward the task. However, contracting on RPI mitigates this effect and increases strategy development compared to only providing RPI. Our results suggest a potential cost to providing RPI. They suggest that if employers want to provide RPI without discouraging strategy development in complex, multi-period tasks, they should contract on RPI instead of providing it as ex post information only.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: Strategy development, learning, comparative feedback, goals, rank-order tournaments
JEL Classification: M40, M46working papers series
Date posted: August 14, 2010 ; Last revised: April 10, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.657 seconds