Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1658657
 


 



Intra-Group Preferencing: Problems of Proof in Colorism and Identity Performance Cases


Trina Jones


Duke University School of Law

August 13, 2010

New York University Review & Social Change, Vol. 34, 2010

Abstract:     
Historically, U.S. anti-discrimination law has been concerned with the total exclusion of certain groups from the workplace or from particular job categories within the workplace. Laws were directed at this across-the-board intolerance. As scholars (including Devon Carbado, Barbara Flagg, Mitu Gulati, Angela Harris and others) have noted, this is not the sole or arguably the primary way in which discrimination operates today. Homogeneous institutions and job categories are now suspicious (and presumably the market will no longer tolerate such places). Thus, instead of the wholesale exclusion of groups, what we are more likely to see is intra-group “screening” or “preferencing” to determine who will be included; that is, instead of the total exclusion of a group, employers are more likely to identify within groups those individuals they find most palatable (e.g., by selecting a lighter-toned African American over a darker-toned African American, a woman who wears makeup over a woman who does not, or a gay male who downplays his sexuality over a gay male who celebrates it).

Although scholars have done an excellent job documenting the ways in which intra-group discrimination happens and have made progress in securing legal recognition of intra-group claims, one question has received scant attention in the literature. It is this: assuming a legal basis for intra-group claims, can plaintiffs actually win these cases? In other words, it is one thing to be able to assert a right to relief; it is another to convince a fact finder to grant that relief. In the attached article, Intra-Group Preferencing: Problems of Proof in Colorism and Identity Performance Cases, I fill a missing void in the literature by exposing the unique challenges that plaintiffs face in proving intra-group claims. I also demonstrate ways in which traditional legal frameworks must be tweaked in order to address more subtle and nuanced contemporary discrimination.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Colorism, Employment Discrimination, Race, Identity Performance

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Jones, Trina, Intra-Group Preferencing: Problems of Proof in Colorism and Identity Performance Cases (August 13, 2010). New York University Review & Social Change, Vol. 34, 2010 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1658657

Contact Information

Trina Jones (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7177 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 410
Downloads: 38

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds