|
||||
|
||||
Unmanifested Harm in Business-to-Consumer TransactionsGeoffrey P. MillerNew York University School of Law August 16, 2010 NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 10-35 Abstract: Consumer products sometimes display the quality of unmanifested harm: they have not yet failed or caused harm, but they have a statistical probability of failing prior to the expiration of their expected useful life or of causing harm to exposed persons. In this situation, should consumers be entitled to an immediate remedy, or should they be required to wait until the harm becomes manifest? This article considers four liability regimes for unmanifested harm: (a) delayed damages that require the consumer to wait until the harm occurs; (b) anticipatory damages that award money to a consumer based on the statistical probability that the product will fail or cause harm; (c) injunctive relief prohibiting the manufacturer from producing the product; and (d) trust damages, under which the manufacturer endows a bankruptcy-remote fund for the purpose of compensating consumers if and when harm occurs. It turns out that any of these remedies can be efficient, and that the efficiency implications of the different remedies depend on the facts and circumstances of a given situation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22 Keywords: Contract Law, Tort Law and Product Liability, Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law JEL Classification: K12, K13, K42 working papers seriesDate posted: August 18, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.844 seconds