Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1660215
 
 

Footnotes (119)



 


 



Defending the NLRB: Improving the Agency’s Success in the Federal Courts of Appeal


Jeffrey M. Hirsch


University of North Carolina School of Law

August 16, 2010

Florida International Law Review, 2011
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 113

Abstract:     
Commentators have made innumerable recommendations to improve the National Labor Relations Board’s administration of the National Labor Relations Act. Yet one subject that has been largely ignored in these discussions is the fact that no matter how good the administrative enforcement of the NLRA is, or could be, it will mean very little if the NLRB cannot defend its decisions in the courts of appeals.

The stakes of this inquiry are high. Because the NLRB cannot enforce its own orders, any losing party can delay compliance with a Board order by seeking review before an appellate court. This delay itself can substantially undermine employees’ labor rights - particularly when a case involves representational issues, in which employees’ support for a union often diminishes as time passes. Yet the problems associated with delay are exacerbated if losing parties believe they have a good chance of winning before the courts. Although some parties may challenge a Board order no matter their chances, others may seriously weigh the costs and benefits of further litigation. For these parties, the prospect of reversing a Board order may lead to additional challenges, more delay, and ultimately an inability of employees to enjoy their labor rights.

This article addresses this issue by proposing several reforms intended to improve the Board’s success in the courts of appeals. These reforms include attempting to improve the format and substance of NLRB decisions, increasing the emphasis on the standard of review, considering limited types of forum shopping, increasing the use of rulemaking, reducing delay, and requesting more injunctive relief. None of these strategies, if enacted, would be a silver bullet that would solve all of the difficulties that the Board faces in court. In the aggregate, however, they could improve the Board’s standing in the eyes of federal appellate courts, thereby improving the Board’s long-term success. Moreover, a renewed focus on the need to win before the courts of appeals could enhance the Board’s success in the short term by improving some of its individual decisions, thereby making them better candidates for court enforcement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: labor, NLRB, NLRA, union, agencies, administrative law

JEL Classification: J5, J50, D73, K23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 18, 2010 ; Last revised: September 2, 2010

Suggested Citation

Hirsch, Jeffrey M., Defending the NLRB: Improving the Agency’s Success in the Federal Courts of Appeal (August 16, 2010). Florida International Law Review, 2011 ; University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 113. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1660215

Contact Information

Jeffrey M. Hirsch (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-962-7675 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 908
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 155,805
Footnotes:  119

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.141 seconds