Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1660262
 
 

Footnotes (53)



 


 



Making the Best of It: A Conceptual Reconstruction of Abortion Jurisprudence in the United States and Mexico


Luisa Conesa Labastida


affiliation not provided to SSRN


Mexican Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2010

Abstract:     
This article makes an effort to identify conceptual categories abstracted from the history of abortion case law in the United States, with the ultimate goal of building a conceptual constitutional framework that is more or less detached from the particularities of the legal system that created it. The result is then used to evaluate the unprecedented ruling by the Mexican Supreme Court in 2008 to decriminalize abortion. The study is divided into five sections. Section I asks why women should be allowed to have abortions. The answer to this question justifies the existence of the right to choose, which involves interests, rights, principles and values. Sections II and III consider how the State should regulate abortion procedures by presenting a detailed regulatory scheme born out of various concepts of United States jurisprudence. Section IV offers some general conclusions on American case law. Finally, Section V focuses on the decriminalization of abortion in the Mexico City Criminal Code. It offers an exercise in comparative law that gives a detailed account of the content of the newly reformed statute and its constitutional challenge in the Mexican Supreme Court, analyzing it through the newly constructed looking glass.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Abortion, jurisprudence, United States, Mexico, comparative law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 18, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Conesa Labastida, Luisa, Making the Best of It: A Conceptual Reconstruction of Abortion Jurisprudence in the United States and Mexico. Mexican Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2010 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1660262

Contact Information

Luisa Conesa Labastida (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 161
Downloads: 28
Footnotes:  53

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds