|
||||
|
||||
Revising the Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons from the E.U. and the U.S.Richard GilbertUniversity of California, Berkeley - Department of Economics Daniel L. RubinfeldUniversity of California at Berkeley - School of Law; NYU Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) COMPETITION POLICY AND REGULATIONS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CHINA, EUROPE AND THE US, M. Faure and X. Zhang, eds., Edward Elgar, Forthcoming UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1660638 Abstract: Recently, the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have embarked on an effort to revise and update the U.S. Horizontal Merger Guidelines. here is substantial overlap between the U.S. and E.U. Guidelines, which makes a proposal for U.S. revisions immediately applicable to the E.U. and elsewhere. The U.S. Merger Guidelines can be revised in light of the learning of economists and lawyers in the past two decades to emphasize the importance of competitive effects analysis in merger evaluation and the forces that drive innovation. The Guidelines should also note that once a competitive effects analysis has been completed, it is possible to “back out” a relevant market (or markets) that is consistent with that competitive effects analysis.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21 Keywords: Mergers, Guidelines JEL Classification: L10, L40 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: August 19, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.360 seconds