Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1660803
 
 

Footnotes (52)



 


 



U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Price Squeeze Claim: A High Point for Divergence between US and European Law?


Warren S. Grimes


Southwestern Law School

August 17, 2010

Zeitschrift Für Wettwebersrecht, p. 343, 2009
Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1024

Abstract:     
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. LinkLine Communications rejected price squeeze claims brought under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. In support of this holding, the majority cited concerns with maintaining a monopolist’s freedom of action necessary to promote competition and innovation. The Court majority also stressed the difficulties of administering a price squeeze test. The author challenges the Court’s reasoning on each of these points. The monopolist’s duty to deal in this case was unchallenged, as was the exclusionary effects of it’s behavior. The Court’s rejection of the price squeeze claim came at the expense of the underlying consumer welfare goals of the Sherman Act. The Court also turned aside an opportunity to adopt a workable price transfer test for assessing price squeezes by a dominant, vertically integrated firm, the same test that the European Commission applied in the Deutsche Telecom case. The LinkLine Court’s decision is consistent with a line of ideological decisions that are often poorly anchored to the facts of the case being decided.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: Antitrust law, Sherman Act, Exclusionary Conduct, Price Squeeze Claims

JEL Classification: K21, L41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 20, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Grimes, Warren S., U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Price Squeeze Claim: A High Point for Divergence between US and European Law? (August 17, 2010). Zeitschrift Für Wettwebersrecht, p. 343, 2009 ; Southwestern Law School Working Paper No. 1024. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1660803 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1660803

Contact Information

Warren S. Grimes (Contact Author)
Southwestern Law School ( email )
3050 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90010
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 768
Downloads: 160
Download Rank: 104,072
Footnotes:  52

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.453 seconds