Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1661185
 
 

Footnotes (196)



 


 



Why Dicta Become Holdings and Why It Matters


Judith M. Stinson


Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

2010

Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 76, 2010

Abstract:     
The distinction between holding and dicta is significant. Yet holdings are sometimes treated as dicta, and more significantly, dictum is regularly elevated to holding. Although the confusion between holding and dicta has garnered substantial discussion, little attention has been paid to why this confusion exists. This Article explores the reasons underlying the conflation of holding and dicta. It identifies several causes, including the cyclical nature of our judicial system, creating a ripple effect; the tendency of courts to emulate the Supreme Court; and our overemphasis on words, phrases, and quotations. The Article argues that by identifying these causes, we can begin to consider solutions that will minimize the elevation of dicta into holding.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: courts, jurisprudence

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 19, 2010 ; Last revised: October 16, 2010

Suggested Citation

Stinson, Judith M., Why Dicta Become Holdings and Why It Matters (2010). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 76, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1661185

Contact Information

Judith M. Stinson (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,877
Downloads: 388
Download Rank: 42,013
Footnotes:  196

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds