Footnotes (196)



Why Dicta Become Holdings and Why It Matters

Judith M. Stinson

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law


Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 76, 2010

The distinction between holding and dicta is significant. Yet holdings are sometimes treated as dicta, and more significantly, dictum is regularly elevated to holding. Although the confusion between holding and dicta has garnered substantial discussion, little attention has been paid to why this confusion exists. This Article explores the reasons underlying the conflation of holding and dicta. It identifies several causes, including the cyclical nature of our judicial system, creating a ripple effect; the tendency of courts to emulate the Supreme Court; and our overemphasis on words, phrases, and quotations. The Article argues that by identifying these causes, we can begin to consider solutions that will minimize the elevation of dicta into holding.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: courts, jurisprudence

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 19, 2010 ; Last revised: October 16, 2010

Suggested Citation

Stinson, Judith M., Why Dicta Become Holdings and Why It Matters (2010). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 76, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1661185

Contact Information

Judith M. Stinson (Contact Author)
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,529
Downloads: 408
Download Rank: 52,364
Footnotes:  196

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds