Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1661832
 


 



Self-Regulation of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation


Anthony D'Amato


Northwestern University - School of Law

1990

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 89, pp. 609-623, 1990
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-38

Abstract:     
No matter what the profession, any charge that a fellow professional is guilty of malpractice is a prima facie invitation to other professionals to retreat to a guild mentality, denying that the infraction took place. The impetus to cover up is not primarily due to friendship toward the accused but rather to a general perception that disclosure would lead to public disrespect of the profession as a whole. Many judges may feel that their own standing in the community could be undermined by disclosures that other judges invent or misstate facts. The issue here is not which judges have integrity, but rather that the judicial culture itself apparently has little room for countenancing disclosure of misbehavior that could undermine public confidence in the judiciary.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Justice and The Judiciary, Judicial Misconduct, Regulation of Judicial Conduct

JEL Classification: K10, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 20, 2010  

Suggested Citation

D'Amato, Anthony, Self-Regulation of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation (1990). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 89, pp. 609-623, 1990; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-38. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1661832

Contact Information

Anthony D'Amato (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 235
Downloads: 29

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.485 seconds