Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1664620
 
 

Footnotes (275)



 


 



Bargained Justice: Plea Bargaining's Innocence Problem and the Brady Safety-Valve


Lucian E. Dervan


Southern Illinois University School of Law

August 24, 2010

2012 Utah Law Review 51 (2012)

Abstract:     
If any number of attorneys were asked in 2004 whether Lea Fastow’s plea bargain in the Enron case was constitutional, the majority would respond with a simple word – Brady. Yet while the 1970 Supreme Court decision Brady v. United States authorized plea bargaining as a form of American justice, the case also contained a vital caveat that has been largely overlooked by scholars, practitioners, and courts for almost forty years. Brady contains a safety-valve that caps the amount of pressure that may be asserted against defendants by prohibiting prosecutors from offering incentives in return for guilty pleas that are so coercive as to overbear defendants’ abilities to act freely. Further, as a means to discern whether the safety-valve fails in the future and prosecutors are offering unconstitutional incentives, the Brady Court created a litmus test regarding innocent defendants. The Court stated that should the plea bargaining system begin to operate in a manner resulting in a significant number of innocent defendants pleading guilty the Court would be forced to reexamine the constitutionality of bargained justice. That plea bargaining today has a significant innocence problem indicates that the Brady safety-valve has failed and, as a result, the constitutionality of modern day plea bargaining is in great doubt.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Plea Bargaining, Confession, Brady v. United States, Supreme Court, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K40, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 25, 2010 ; Last revised: September 1, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dervan, Lucian E., Bargained Justice: Plea Bargaining's Innocence Problem and the Brady Safety-Valve (August 24, 2010). 2012 Utah Law Review 51 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1664620

Contact Information

Lucian E. Dervan (Contact Author)
Southern Illinois University School of Law ( email )
Lesar Law Building
Carbondale, IL 62901
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,716
Downloads: 336
Download Rank: 49,353
Footnotes:  275

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.281 seconds