Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809
 
 

Footnotes (66)



 


 



Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for European Securities Litigation?


Richard W. Painter


University of Minnesota Law School

Wulf A. Kaal


University of St. Thomas, Minnesota - School of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

August 24, 2010


Abstract:     
US courts have analyzed the question of whether Section 10(b) of the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 can be applied to foreign litigants in securities fraud cases as a question of subject matter jurisdiction. The most frequently used approach is the Second Circuit’s so-called “conduct and effects” test which looks at whether conduct contributing to the violation took place in the United States or whether the conduct had an effect on US investors. Before Morrison v. National Australia Bank, US courts have avoided a bright line rule to determine which cases can be litigated in US courts and which cannot.

In the past decade, US courts have faced a rise in foreign cubed cases. In 2008, foreign cubed cases exceeded any previous year and the trend is continuing. One reason for this development could be a lack of securities class actions in European jurisdictions. This void increases incentives for forum shopping by plaintiffs’ lawyers. US law allows plaintiffs to proceed on the basis of the “fraud on the market theory” rather than requiring plaintiffs to prove actual reliance on misleading statements. The paper evaluates the impact of overlapping regulation and legal uncertainty.

Section 7216 of H.R. 5173 would explicitly provide for extraterritorial jurisdiction with respect to antifraud provisions in the federal securities laws if there is “conduct within the United States that constitutes significant steps in furtherance of the violation, even if the securities transaction occurs outside the United States and involves only foreign investors”.

The paper evaluates the impact of Section 7216 on European financial intermediaries, European lawyers, European investors and diplomacy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Foreign cubed cases, subject matter jurisdiction, securities class actions, Europe, Rule 10b-5, Section 7216 of H.R. 5173, Dodd-Frank Act

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 24, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Painter, Richard W. and Kaal , Wulf A., Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for European Securities Litigation? (August 24, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1664809

Contact Information

Richard W. Painter
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-626-9707 (Phone)
Wulf A. Kaal (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota - School of Law ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) ( email )
c/o ECARES ULB CP 114
B-1050 Brussels
Belgium
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,217
Downloads: 249
Download Rank: 67,182
Footnotes:  66

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.797 seconds