Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1665562
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (176)



 


 



Randomization and the Fourth Amendment


Bernard E. Harcourt


Columbia University

Tracey L. Meares


Yale University - Law School

August 25, 2010

U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 530
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 317

Abstract:     
Randomized checkpoint searches are generally taken to be the exact antitheses of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment. In the eyes of most jurists, checkpoint searches violate the central requirement of valid Fourth Amendment searches – namely, individualized suspicion. We disagree. In this article, we contend that randomized searches should form the very lodestar of a reasonable search. The fact is that the notion of “individualized” suspicion is misleading; most suspicion in the modern policing context is group-based and not individual specific. Randomized searches by definition are accompanied by a certain level of suspicion. The constitutional issue, we maintain, should not turn on the question of suspicion-based versus suspicionless police searches, but on the level of suspicion that attaches to any search program and on the evenhandedness of the program. In essence, we argue for a new paradigm of randomized encounters that satisfy a base level of suspicion and that will provide the benefits of both privacy-protection (by ensuring a minimum level of suspicion) and evenhandedness (by cabining police discretion), the very values we wish to protect through the Fourth Amendment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, Individualized Suspicion, Reasonableness, Probable Cause, Articulable Suspicion, Stop-And-Frisk, Checkpoint Searches, Border Patrol Searches, Randomized Searches, Randomization, Drug Testing, School Searches, Roadblocks, Warrants

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 25, 2010 ; Last revised: September 17, 2010

Suggested Citation

Harcourt, Bernard E. and Meares, Tracey L., Randomization and the Fourth Amendment (August 25, 2010). U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 530; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 317. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1665562 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1665562

Contact Information

Bernard E. Harcourt (Contact Author)
Columbia University ( email )
Jerome Green Hall, Room 515
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10027
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.columbia.edu/fac/Bernard_Harcourt
Tracey Louise Meares
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-4074 (Phone)
203-432-4876 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,479
Downloads: 249
Download Rank: 69,153
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  176

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds