Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1665565
 
 

Footnotes (303)



 


 



Arbitration as Delegation


David Horton


University of California, Davis - School of Law

August 25, 2010

New York University Law Review, Vol. 86, 2011
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-34

Abstract:     
Hundreds of millions of consumer and employment contracts include arbitration clauses, class arbitration waivers, and other terms that modify the rules of litigation. These provisions ride the wake of the Supreme Court’s expansive interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). For decades, scholars have criticized the Court’s arbitration jurisprudence for distorting Congress’s intent and tilting the scales of justice in favor of powerful corporations. This Article claims that the Court’s reading of the FAA suffers from a deeper, more fundamental flaw: It has transformed the statute into a private delegation of legislative power. The nondelegation doctrine forbids Congress from allowing private actors to make law unless they do so through a process that internalizes the wishes of affected parties or that is subject to meaningful state oversight. The FAA as construed by the Court violates this rule. First, companies have invoked the statute to create a parallel system of civil procedure for consumer and employment cases. This river of privately made law not only washes away Congress’s procedural rulemaking efforts but dilutes the potency of substantive rights. Second, although businesses ostensibly impose these rules through the mechanism of contracting - a process normally rooted in mutual consent - the Court’s arbitration case law deviates from traditional contract principles. It funnels consumers and employees into arbitration even when they truthfully claim that they did not agree to arbitrate. Third, despite the fact that the FAA as enacted mandates robust judicial review of privately made procedural rules, the Court has all but abolished this safeguard. This Article concludes that the Court should recognize that the FAA as interpreted raises grave private delegation issues and should thus limit the statute.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: arbitration, Federal Arbitration Act, FAA, class arbitration waiver, nondelegation doctrine, delegation clause

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 25, 2010 ; Last revised: May 2, 2011

Suggested Citation

Horton, David, Arbitration as Delegation (August 25, 2010). New York University Law Review, Vol. 86, 2011; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-34. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1665565

Contact Information

David Horton (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,691
Downloads: 221
Download Rank: 76,083
Footnotes:  303

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds