Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1666268
 
 

Footnotes (172)



 


 



Religious Liberty after Gonzales: A Look at State RFRAs


Christopher C. Lund


Wayne State University Law School

August 26, 2010

South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 466, 2010 (symposium)
Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 10-12

Abstract:     
This symposium piece examines the state of religious liberty after the Supreme Court's decision in Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006), which gave a strong interpretation to the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). While Gonzales offers religious believers significant protection from federal laws, most free exercise disputes happen at the state and local level, where Gonzales does not apply.

The future of Free Exercise therefore lies largely in the hands of the states. This piece examines what states have done with it, focusing particularly on state religious freedom restoration acts, called state RFRAs. Examining the field of state RFRA cases, this piece offers some interesting (though certainly preliminary) conclusions.

Perhaps most surprising is the paucity of cases decided under state RFRAs thus far. Sixteen states now have state RFRAs. But four states have never decided even a single case under their state RFRAs, and another six states have decided only one or two. In most jurisdictions with state RFRAs, plaintiffs have not won a single case litigated to judgment. Besides the numbers, the reasoning of these state RFRA cases often leaves much to be desired - courts routinely and improperly heighten the threshold showing of a "substantial burden" on religious exercise, and regularly equate the strict scrutiny standard to be the equivalent of rational basis review.

Beginning with those observations, this piece explains these curiousities and traces them back to their possible sources, along the way addressing the full range of interpretative and normative issues that these state RFRAs present.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Free Exercise, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, RFRA, state RFRAs, Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 27, 2010 ; Last revised: November 11, 2010

Suggested Citation

Lund, Christopher C., Religious Liberty after Gonzales: A Look at State RFRAs (August 26, 2010). South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 466, 2010 (symposium); Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 10-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1666268

Contact Information

Christopher C. Lund (Contact Author)
Wayne State University Law School ( email )
471 Palmer
Detroit, MI 48202
United States
(313) 577-4046 (Phone)
(313) 577-9016 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,629
Downloads: 299
Download Rank: 59,567
Footnotes:  172

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds