Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1666278
 
 

Footnotes (262)



 


 



The Hollow Promise of Freedom of Conscience


Nadia N. Sawicki


Loyola-Chicago School of Law, Beazley Institute for Health Law & Policy

August 23, 2010

33 Cardozo Law Review 1389 (2012) (SSRN posted version is a pre-publication draft)
Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2010-009

Abstract:     
Two hundred years ago, Thomas Jefferson asserted that no law “ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority." Since then, freedom of conscience has continued to be heralded as a fundamental principle of American society. Indeed, many current policy debates – most notably in the medical and military contexts – are predicated on the theory that claims of conscience are worthy of legal respect. This Article challenges established assumptions, concluding that claims about the importance of conscience in American society have been highly exaggerated.

This Article first clarifies contemporary understandings of conscience by systematically analyzing its treatment in positive law. It looks beyond the traditional medical, military, and religious contexts, giving a descriptive account of law’s treatment of conscience across various substantive realms, including tax evasion, civil disobedience, discrimination, and even violent terrorism. It demonstrates that legal accommodations are typically granted on an ad hoc basis, only to the extent that exercises of personal conscience align with generally accepted and politically palatable moral principles. If there is a consistent and principled justification for treating cases differently, our legal system has thus far failed to provide it.

This Article argues that, in order for American law to reflect the kind of robust, autonomy-based respect for conscience to which every pluralistic society aspires, we must agree on a content-neutral guiding principle for negotiating future claims for legal accommodation. The alternative, the Article posits, is to concede that American society has abandoned the fundamental purpose of conscientious accommodation – namely, protecting the individual from oppressive majoritarian understandings of morality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: conscientious objection, freedom of conscience, liberty of conscience, freedom of religion

JEL Classification: K10, K40, K42

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 28, 2010 ; Last revised: July 15, 2013

Suggested Citation

Sawicki, Nadia N., The Hollow Promise of Freedom of Conscience (August 23, 2010). 33 Cardozo Law Review 1389 (2012) (SSRN posted version is a pre-publication draft); Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2010-009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1666278

Contact Information

Nadia N. Sawicki (Contact Author)
Loyola-Chicago School of Law, Beazley Institute for Health Law & Policy ( email )
25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 874
Downloads: 175
Download Rank: 101,362
Footnotes:  262

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds