Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1666856
 
 

Footnotes (311)



 


 



Plea Bargains, Convictions and Legitimacy


Gregory M. Gilchrist


University of Toledo College of Law

October 10, 2010

American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 48, p. 143, 2011

Abstract:     
Plea bargaining is a pervasive and troubling aspect of our criminal justice system. Recent criticism of the practice has concentrated on its failure to mirror the likely outcome of trial. Convictions generated through plea bargaining are less related to the evidence, and, hence, to actual guilt, than convictions generated by trial. Notwithstanding this significant difference between the processes and factors that generate convictions by trial and those that generate convictions by plea bargain, the legal system treats all convictions as formally identical. In doing so, the legal system violates basic principles of fairness and undermines its legitimacy. To the extent bargained-for convictions are aligned less reliably with actual guilt than convictions after trial, they should be classified as distinct from trial convictions. Additionally, defendants who wish to secure the benefit of a plea bargain routinely are compelled to admit factual guilt to do so. Yet, innocent persons will sometimes be induced to plead guilty through the practice of plea bargaining. Compelling the innocent to lie in order to secure the benefit of a plea bargain further undermines the perceived integrity of the legal system by denying the defendant of a meaningful opportunity to be heard. This Article proposes that plea bargaining be regulated through a few simple and clear rules that would limit the harm to the legal system caused by the practice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Plea Bargain, Guilty Plea, Integrity, Fairness, Stuntz, Alschuler, Schulhofer, Bibas, Charge Bargaining, Cognitive Bias

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 30, 2010 ; Last revised: September 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Gilchrist, Gregory M., Plea Bargains, Convictions and Legitimacy (October 10, 2010). American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 48, p. 143, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1666856

Contact Information

Gregory M. Gilchrist (Contact Author)
University of Toledo College of Law ( email )
2801 W Bancroft
MS 507
Toledo, OH 43606
United States
419-530-2712 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 655
Downloads: 145
Download Rank: 116,631
Footnotes:  311

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds