Tragedy, Farce or Legal Mobilization? The Danish Cartoons in Court in France and Canada
Robert A. Kahn
University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)
U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-21
Why would anyone prosecute the Danish Cartoons? Even as North Americans and Europeans debated whether the cartoons should have been commissioned by the Jyllands Posten or republished elsewhere, most agreed that prosecutions were totally out of line in a liberal Western state. And, yet, there were prosecutions in both France and Canada. While each prosecution ultimately failed from a legal perspective, both cases also operated on the level of symbolic politics. Here the results were mixed. While the Muslim groups that sued Charlie Hebdo won a partial victory when a French court conceded that the turban cartoon was, standing alone, offensive to Muslims, the Canadian Human Rights prosecution against Ezra Levant ended with the entire system of human rights proceedings on trial. This paper tells the story of these two cases.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: freedom of expression, offensive speech, Danish Cartoons
Date posted: August 30, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.422 seconds