Calibrating Patent Lifetimes
Eric E. Johnson
University of North Dakota School of Law; Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society
Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2006
The patent system could better achieve its primary mission of incentivizing technological innovation by moving away from the one-size-fits-all 20-year term for patents and moving to a system of varying durations for different categories of invention. The current patent duration is arbitrary, the result of entrenched historical accident. Allowing upward variance from the 20-year term in discrete categories of invention offers the prospect of boosting innovation in impoverished technological sectors. Allowing downward variance in other categories would benefit overall social welfare by removing needless technological monopolization and associated deadweight loss.
Current economic models and available economic data do not allow for the academic calculation of optimal patent lifetimes in the real world. This paper proposes practical procedural mechanisms to gather and synthesize information about innovation incentives and returns, and to make use of that information in decision-making paradigms that would vary patent terms to make the patent system more economically beneficial than it currently is. An appendix to this paper uses theoretical evolutionary biology to criticize economic theorists who have suggested that very long or even infinite durations for patents may be optimal.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: patent, patents, intellectual property, innovation, invention, duration, terms, economics
JEL Classification: D60, E60, 030, 031, 034, H41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 30, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds