Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1667119
 


 



Evaluating Alternative Weighting Schemes for Stocks in a ‘Best Ideas’ Portfolio


Lynda Livingston


University of Puget Sound - School of Business and Leadership

2010

The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 117-136, 2010

Abstract:     
As institutional investors have become more aggressive in deploying their capital, fund managers have become more creative with their product offerings. In this paper, we consider a new institutional fund of mutual funds, a portfolio that combines the “best-idea” stocks from two underlying primary funds. The sponsor of this portfolio has chosen to weight all of the stocks equally, even those chosen by both of the underlying funds’ managers. However, stocks chosen by both managers may be more likely to outperform. We propose an alternative weighting scheme, where these “confirmed” stocks are weighted more heavily. We show that this overweighting strategy leads to a higher expected portfolio return than does the equally weighted scheme used by the sponsor.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Funds-of-funds, Mutual Funds

JEL Classification: G11, G23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 9, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Livingston, Lynda, Evaluating Alternative Weighting Schemes for Stocks in a ‘Best Ideas’ Portfolio (2010). The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 117-136, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1667119

Contact Information

Lynda Livingston (Contact Author)
University of Puget Sound - School of Business and Leadership ( email )
1500 N Warner St.
Tacoma, WA 98416
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 241
Downloads: 43

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds