Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1669712
 
 

Footnotes (142)



 


 



Vietnam Through Chinese Eyes: Divergent Accountability in Single-Party Regimes


Regina M. Abrami


Harvard Business School

Edmund J. Malesky


Duke University, Political Science

Yu Zheng


University of Connecticut

August 31, 2010


Abstract:     
In 2006, a flurry of articles appeared in Chinese newspapers comparing China’s democratic development unfavorably with that of Vietnam. Chinese journalists cited several features which revealed sharp differences across cases, and despite Communist Party leadership existing in both places. These differences included: (a) the direct election of the general secretary of the Vietnamese Communist Party; (b) the power of the Vietnamese Central Committee (CC) to make decisions independently of the Political Bureau (Politburo) and even to overrule the Politburo on occasion; (c) the encouragement of public commentary on the Vietnamese Communist Party’s political report in advance of its party congress; and (d) countrywide direct elections of members of Vietnam’s National Assembly, including a relatively high number of candidates per seat.

Vietnam remains a one-party state, therefore advances in democratic development remain deeply constrained. Nonetheless, attraction to its political institutions was severe enough that Hu Jintao, president and general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), felt compelled to issue an internal CCP document. He criticized the Vietnamese authorities for moving “too quickly toward inner-party democracy,” even warning that a de-stabilizing Mikhail Gorbachev-like figure may come to power. The CCP also banned public discussion of Vietnam’s reforms, deploying instead party intellectuals to argue against a Vietnam-like course of political development. Clearly, the comparison was found unflattering to the present Chinese leaders. Early on, they had advocated greater “inner-party democracy” and a “serve the people” credo to draw distinctions from the prior Jiang Zemin era.

Such unwanted comparisons also reveal an intriguing puzzle for the comparative politics sub-field. That is, no indices of governance currently available can account adequately for the institutional differences revealed in the Chinese press, no less their relation to the persistence of communist rule in each place. To the contrary, political dynamics continue to be assumed instead of explained through the close conceptual association of regime type with degrees of political accountability that remains in the comparative politics literature. The subsequent inability of existing scales to capture within-typology variation is an important lacuna in our understanding of authoritarian regimes, and perhaps more critically the mechanisms by which they remain resilient or collapse. Taking this shortcoming as our starting point, we focus on formal institutions of accountability within these two single-party states.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 73

Keywords: Single-Party State, Vietnam, China, Accountabiluity, Institutions

JEL Classification: P2, P3

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 2, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Abrami, Regina M. and Malesky, Edmund J. and Zheng, Yu, Vietnam Through Chinese Eyes: Divergent Accountability in Single-Party Regimes (August 31, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1669712 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1669712

Contact Information

Regina M. Abrami
Harvard Business School ( email )
Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 270C
Boston, MA 02163
United States
Edmund J. Malesky (Contact Author)
Duke University, Political Science ( email )
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States
Yu Zheng
University of Connecticut ( email )
1 University Place
Stamford, CT 06901
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 918
Downloads: 176
Download Rank: 102,430
Footnotes:  142

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.391 seconds