Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1669816
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (104)



 


 



The End of Mandatory Securities Arbitration?


Jill Gross


Pace Law School

August 31, 2010

Pace Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2010

Abstract:     
In this essay, I examine recent Congressional efforts to ban pre-dispute arbitration clauses in securities brokerage account agreements and thus eliminate mandatory arbitration of customer-broker disputes. In the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act, Congress would ban such clauses in all consumer contracts, including in the securities industry. However, securities arbitration - whose fairness is regulated with substantial oversight by the Securities and Exchange Commission - does not suffer from the same features and flaws that critics of arbitration in other forums have excoriated as oppressively unfair. In the recently-enacted Dodd-Frank Act, Congress delegated to the SEC the authority to prohibit arbitration clauses in customer agreements through admininstrative rule-making. After examining these regulatory efforts, I argue that neither Congress nor the SEC should prohibit mandatory securities arbitration because it would have significant adverse consequences for investors and for the vitality of the dispute resolution mechanism. The essay concludes by asserting that regulators should not enact arbitration reform that needlessly and without foundation brands securities arbitration as the evil twin of adhesive consumer arbitration.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: securities, arbitration

JEL Classification: K4, K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 2, 2010 ; Last revised: September 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Gross, Jill, The End of Mandatory Securities Arbitration? (August 31, 2010). Pace Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1669816

Contact Information

Jill Gross (Contact Author)
Pace Law School ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 909
Downloads: 180
Download Rank: 96,661
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  104

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds