|
||||
|
||||
Diversity, Social Goods Provision, and Performance in the FirmSara Fisher EllisonMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics Jeffrey GreenbaumUniversity of California, Berkeley - Department of Economics Wallace P. MullinGeorge Washington University - Department of Economics August 31, 2010 MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 10-11 Abstract: The last decade has seen a growing interest among economists on the effect of diversity on the provision of social goods and the stock of social capital. Indeed, in the workplace, cooperation, trust, and other social goods may be important elements of the smooth functioning of an office, but firm owners ultimately care about an office’s performance, as reflected in revenues, costs, and profits. We explore this next logical question: how does diversity affect ultimate performance? We have a unique data set from a firm which operates numerous small offices in the United States and abroad. They have provided us with eight years of individual-level employee survey data, which measure quantities such as level of cooperation, as well as office-level measures of diversity and performance over that period. We find some evidence that more homogeneous offices enjoy higher levels of social goods provision but that those offices do not perform any better and may actually perform worse. We speculate that one possible reason that the more homogeneous offices do not perform better despite higher levels of social goods provision is that they do not have as diverse a portfolio of skills, talents, and interests on which to draw.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30 Keywords: Diversity and Social Goods JEL Classification: J16, L2 working papers seriesDate posted: September 2, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.563 seconds