Footnotes (102)



What McDonald Means for Unenumerated Rights

A. Christopher Bryant

University of Cincinnati - College of Law

September 1, 2010

U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 10-27

In June a splintered Supreme Court held in McDonald v. City of Chicago that the Second Amendment applied to state and local governments. But the case was about much more than handguns. It presented the Court with an unprecedented opportunity to correct its own erroneous precedent and revive the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause. The plurality declined the offer not, as Justice Alito’s opinion suggested, out of a profound respect for stare decisis, but rather because at least four Justices like the consequences of that ancient error, especially insofar as unenumerated rights are concerned. This observation in turn raises questions about interpretative method and the Court’s fidelity to the written Constitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: McDonald, Second Amendment, Privileges or Immunities, Fourteenth Amendment

JEL Classification: K10

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 5, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Bryant, A. Christopher, What McDonald Means for Unenumerated Rights (September 1, 2010). U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 10-27. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1671959 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1671959

Contact Information

A. Christopher Bryant (Contact Author)
University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
513-556-6805 (Phone)
513-556-1236 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 981
Downloads: 60
Download Rank: 271,073
Footnotes:  102

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds