Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1673116
 
 

Footnotes (273)



 


 



The Complexity of Jurisdictional Clarity


Scott Dodson


University of California Hastings College of the Law

September 7, 2010

Virginia Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1, p. 1, 2011
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-53

Abstract:     
The ideal of clear and simple jurisdictional rules seems like a no-brainer. Clarity in areas of subject-matter jurisdiction generally reduces the cost of litigating those issues and thus preserves litigant and judicial resources for the merits of a dispute. As a result, scholars and justices regularly promote the rhetoric of jurisdictional clarity. Yet no one has probed that rhetoric or reconciled it with the reality of subject-matter jurisdiction doctrine, which is anything but clear and simple. This Article begins to fill that gap, and, in the process, shifts the perspective of existing conversations between rules and standards and between mandates and discretion toward a perspective that focuses on the value and attainability of clarity. It offers a more refined understanding of the surprising uncertainty and complexity of jurisdictional clarity, and it argues that, contrary to the rhetoric, the ideal of jurisdictional clarity is mostly illusory. Difficulties inherent in the design, implementation, and instrumental direction of clear and simple jurisdictional rules largely render them unattainable. Rather than continue to invoke the unexamined ideal of clarity and simplicity, jurisdictional doctrine should strive to confine clarity to what it can reasonably accomplish and to embrace the undervalued virtues of uncertainty and complexity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: Jurisdiction, Jurisdictionality, Clarity, Discretion, Rules, Standards, Uncertainty, Jurisdictional Rules, Shapiro, Redish, Well-Pleaded Complaint

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 20, 2010 ; Last revised: November 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dodson, Scott, The Complexity of Jurisdictional Clarity (September 7, 2010). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 1, p. 1, 2011; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-53. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1673116

Contact Information

Scott Dodson (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-581-8959 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://https://www.uchastings.edu/faculty-administration/faculty/dodson/index.html

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,513
Downloads: 198
Download Rank: 89,175
Footnotes:  273

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds