Judicial Deference and Sexual Discrimination in the University

Mark Bartholomew

SUNY Buffalo Law School


Buffalo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 8, p. 55, 2000

Tenure discrimination plaintiffs confront a judiciary that regularly defers to the administrative judgments of universities. Strangely, however, student plaintiffs suing under Title IX do not confront the same deferential posture. This occurs even when the student plaintiffs are suing their professors over classroom speech and academic freedom is at stake. After presenting the evidence of an asymmetrical application of judicial deference to the university, the Article critiques the Supreme Court’s decision in Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District to weaken the remedial powers of Title IX relative to Title VII. The Article then explores the arguments for and against judicial deference in the academic setting and concludes by offering some suggestion for evaluating academic gender discrimination suits and applying the deference doctrine uniformly.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: Title VII, Title IX, Tenure, Universities, Discrimination, Gebser, Academic Freedom

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 8, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Bartholomew, Mark, Judicial Deference and Sexual Discrimination in the University (2000). Buffalo Women's Law Journal, Vol. 8, p. 55, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1673312

Contact Information

Mark Bartholomew (Contact Author)
SUNY Buffalo Law School ( email )
528 O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-1100
United States
716-645-5959 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 470
Downloads: 30

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds