Deciding Whether the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished
Thomas H. Koenig
Michael L. Rustad
Suffolk University Law School
Suffolk University Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 193, 2011
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 10-42
Professors Thomas H. Koenig & Michael L. Rustad’s review essay highlights the importance of Russell Murphy’s recent book, Voices of the Death Penalty Debate: A Citizen’s Guide to Capital Punishment for social science classes as well as the legal academy. This review essay contends that Murphy’s narrative approach to death penalty arguments is pedagogically the most sound approach to thinking about the death penalty.
Lawyers, journalists, and informed members of the public need this book because it dispassionately examines the arguments for and against the death penalty in an innovative format: through witness testimony. The title of this book reflects Murphy’s sincere attempt to present the arguments and the witnesses’ testimony in a fair and impartial manner that is in the best tradition of field studies in sociology. This is a “deliberately different” book in that it presents multiple perspectives through the narratives of major participants in the death penalty debates: criminologists, legal academics, social scientists, religious leaders, family members of victims, and former death row inmates vindicated by later discovered evidence. The review essay concludes that this book is a significant contribution to the social science literature in that it enables students, scholars, and policymakers to consider diverse arguments in a format that is fair and balanced.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 9, 2010 ; Last revised: May 10, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds