A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology
Public Policy Institute of California
Seth E. Masket
University of Denver
University of Houston - Department of Political Science; Georgetown University, Department of Government
Princeton University - Department of Political Science
Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs; Princeton University - Department of Political Science
May 1, 2013
American Journal of Political Science, v58, n2, April 2014, pp. 337-351
Many theoretical and empirical accounts of representation argue that primary elections are a polarizing influence. Likewise, many reformers advocate opening party nominations to non-members as a way of increasing the number of moderate elected officials. Data and measurement constraints, however, have limited the range of empirical tests of this argument. We marry a unique new data set of state legislator ideal points to a detailed accounting of primary systems in the United States to gauge the effect of primary systems on polarization. We find that the openness of a primary election has little, if any, effect on the extremity of the politicians it produces.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: State legislatures, polarization, primaries, American politics, partisanship
Date posted: September 9, 2010 ; Last revised: July 9, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.266 seconds