The Fallacy of Regulatory Symmetry: An Economic Analysis of the 'Level Playing Field' in Cable TV Franchising Statutes
Thomas W. Hazlett
George Mason University Dept. of Economics and School of Law
George S. Ford
Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies
Business and Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 21-46, 2001
Formal regulatory parity can entail counterintuitive effects. In a series of state statutes, municipal governments have been directed to issue cable TV franchises to new competitors only after (a) formal hearings considering the ‘public interest’ in competition; and (b) imposing terms and conditions which are at least as burdensome as those contained in the incumbent’s franchise. While billed as ‘level playing field’ laws, economic theory, an important case study in Connecticut, and a probit analysis of Ameritech’s cable franchise acquisition strategy suggest that these statutes actually tilt the field against entrants.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: Level Playing Field, Cable TV, Television, Franchising, Entry Deterrence
JEL Classification: L5Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 10, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.468 seconds