Social Networking and Workers’ Compensation Law at the Crossroads
Gregory M. Duhl
William Mitchell College of Law
Jaclyn S. Millner
September 1, 2010
Pace Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2011
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-16
Over the past decade, social networking has increasingly influenced the practice of both civil and criminal law. One way to illustrate those influences is to examine a “system” of laws and the parties and lawyers in that system. In this article, we examine how social networking has influenced workers’ compensation law, looking at, in particular, the intersection of professional responsibility, discovery, privacy, and evidence with social networking in state workers’ compensation systems.
Workers’ compensation laws are no-fault insurance systems designed to resolve disputes efficiently. Consequently, the rules of evidence are often more relaxed and the rules of discovery often more restricted than in state and federal court litigation. The flexible and self-contained structure of workers’ compensation systems provides an ideal backdrop against which to examine how information from social networking sites can be used as evidence to resolve civil disputes.
A state’s workers’ compensation system should use the rules that have traditionally applied to non-electronic information as a starting point to address issues arising from lawyers gathering and introducing into evidence information stored on social networking sites. At the same time, because of the efficiency of workers’ compensation law and the large discretion vested in its judges, workers’ compensation systems have the potential to be laboratories for new technologies and how they can be used in the resolution of disputes, both inside and outside of workers’ compensation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: Deception in Lawyering, Electronic Discovery, Electronically Stored Information, Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace, Social Networking, Surveillance, Work Injury, Workers' CompensationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 12, 2010 ; Last revised: September 7, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.390 seconds