Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1675168
 


 



Learning Styles: What Difference Do the Differences Make?


Aida Marie Alaka


Washburn University School of Law

September 10, 2010

Charleston Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2011

Abstract:     
As the legal academy contemplates education reform, many scholars are looking to education theory and best practices to guide curriculum and course design. This has resulted in the publication of several law journal articles discussing different aspects of learning theory, including learning styles. Broadly speaking, “learning styles” have been defined as “those cognitive, affective, and psychological behaviors that indicate how learners interact with and respond to the learning environment and how they perceive, process, store, and recall what they are attempting to learn.”

Most of law journal articles on learning styles presume the validity of the concept. The concept of learning styles is, and always has been, controversial, however. Many education psychologists and others involved in researching educational theories are highly critical of the notion that students possess fixed learning styles, which teachers must address so that the students can learn. In the last few years, two comprehensive literature reviews have been conducted to assess the theoretical and research bases underlying the spectrum of learning style theories. These two are just the most recent. And yet, many in legal education think of the existence of learning styles as being settled fact. They also think of them rather narrowly – primarily as a question of whether one has a visual, auditory, or kinesthetic style – although many different learning style theories exist.

In “Learning Styles: What Difference do the Differences Make?” I introduce the controversy surrounding the issue of learning styles and present the critical bases for the controversy. I explain that most disinterested researchers are particularly skeptical of the “matching hypothesis”; that is, that one must teach to specific styles. As the first article to address these issues in the context of legal education, this article presents a unique perspective for those who seek to enhance teaching and learning in law schools.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 11, 2010 ; Last revised: March 15, 2011

Suggested Citation

Alaka, Aida Marie, Learning Styles: What Difference Do the Differences Make? (September 10, 2010). Charleston Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1675168

Contact Information

Aida Marie Alaka (Contact Author)
Washburn University School of Law ( email )
1700 College Avenue
Topeka, KS 66621
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,444
Downloads: 540
Download Rank: 27,974
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Reaching the Visual Learner: Teaching Property Through Art
By William Bradford

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.282 seconds