|
||||
|
||||
Incentive Effects of Class Actions and Punitive Damages Under Alternative Procedural RegimesMarta CeniniUniversity of Milan - Faculty of Law Barbara LuppiUniversità degli studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE) - Faculty of Business and Economics; University of St. Thomas School of Law Francesco ParisiUniversity of Minnesota - Law School; University of Bologna September 11, 2010 Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-50 Abstract: In an economic perspective, punitive damages and class actions can be viewed as sharing a common economic function – creating optimal deterrence. Building on Parisi and Cenini (2010), we study the effect of alternative procedural regimes on the effectiveness of punitive damages and class actions. Specifically, we compare the workings of punitive damages and class actions in the American and English (“loser-pays”) regimes. Our findings help explain the limited use and late adoption of class actions and punitive damages in Europe.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15 Keywords: Punitive Damages, Class Actions, Loser-Pays Rule, Incentives JEL Classification: K13, K4 working papers seriesDate posted: September 14, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds