Footnotes (220)



Our Class Action Federalism: Erie and the Rules Enabling Act after Shady Grove

Adam Steinman

University of Alabama - School of Law

April 14, 2011

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 86, p.1131, 2011

The intersection of federalism and class-action litigation has been an area of significant controversy in recent years. With the 2005 Class Action Fairness Act placing more high-stakes class actions into federal court, an especially crucial question is the extent to which the Erie doctrine and the Rules Enabling Act (REA) require federal courts to follow state class-action law. The Supreme Court’s decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. begins to confront this issue, but many unanswered questions remain. Under several lines of argument that were neither made nor considered in Shady Grove, the Erie doctrine and the REA would require federal courts to apply state class-action law, whether state law is more tolerant or less tolerant of class actions than the prevailing federal approach. In particular, Shady Grove leaves open the possibility that state class-action law may influence a federal court’s application of Rule 23’s certification requirements, as well as other matters - available remedies, statutes of limitations, and the preclusive effect of the ultimate judgment - that can arise during the course of a putative class action. This article identifies these important unresolved issues, and then suggests a more precise doctrinal framework for addressing them (and Erie/REA issues more generally).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Shady Grove, Erie, Rules Enabling Act, REA, Class Action, Class Certification, Rule 23, FRCP 23, Scalia, Stevens, Ginsburg

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K40, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 14, 2010 ; Last revised: July 18, 2014

Suggested Citation

Steinman, Adam, Our Class Action Federalism: Erie and the Rules Enabling Act after Shady Grove (April 14, 2011). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 86, p.1131, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1676565

Contact Information

Adam Steinman (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,196
Downloads: 338
Download Rank: 58,640
Footnotes:  220

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds