|
||||
|
||||
Are Existing Stock Broker Standards Sufficient? Principles, Rules and Fiduciary DutiesThomas Lee HazenUniversity of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law November 15, 2010 Columbia Business Law Review, Vol. 2010, No. 3, Fall 2010 UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1677448 Abstract: In recent years there has been concern as to the adequacy of broker-dealer regulation. SEC and self regulatory organization rulemaking addresses specific types of broker-dealer conduct but by and large the regulation has been based on principles and standards rather than voluminous detailed rules specifying prohibited conduct. In particular, a good deal of broker-dealer conduct is addressed under the umbrella of regulating according to fair and just principles of trade. Also, much of the SEC’s rulemaking authority is based on the ability to prohibit fraudulent, manipulative, and deceptive devices. It also has been suggested that broker-dealers should be subject to fiduciary duties but to a large extent, they already are. This article examines the extent to which principles-based regulation or the setting of general standards should be further supplemented by rulemaking addressing specific types of conduct.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54 Keywords: Administrative Law, Broker-Dealers, Business Law, Fiduciary Duties, Financial Regulation, Securities Regulation Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 17, 2010 ; Last revised: November 16, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.500 seconds