Contemporary Meaning and Expectations in Statutory Interpretation
Hillel Y. Levin
University of Georgia Law School
September 15, 2010
University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2012, No. 4, 2012
UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-19
This Article introduces and explores an approach to, or theme within, statutory interpretation, one grounded in contemporary meaning and expectations. This approach posits that judges interpreting ambiguous statutes are and should be constrained by the understanding and expectations of the contemporary public as to the law’s meaning and application. These are developed in response to, and mediated by, the actions and statements of government officials and the broader community. The Article argues that this apparently radical approach is necessary in order for law to maintain its moral force, and further that the principles underlying it are embedded in several doctrines and modalities of statutory interpretation. Further, the approach serves judicially conservative ends: promoting accessibility of the law to those governed by it, supporting social and legal stability and predictability, privileging organic and incremental change over radical breach, encouraging judicial minimalism and legislative maximalism, and fostering equality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56
Keywords: Statutory interpretation, legislation, theory, dynamic statutory interpretation, contemporary meaning and expectations, precedent
JEL Classification: K10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 17, 2010 ; Last revised: August 31, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.484 seconds