Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1679534
 
 

Footnotes (24)



 


 



Direct Democracy, Courts, and Majority Will


Michael D. Gilbert


University of Virginia School of Law

March 22, 2010

Election Law Journal, Vol. 9, p. 211, 2010

Abstract:     
This paper reviews Direct Democracy and the Courts by Ken Miller.

Voters in many states use ballot propositions to enact laws on everything from term limits and abortion to taxes and same-sex marriage. Many of these propositions test the boundaries of federal and state constitutional law. This pits the people, who support the propositions and who are sovereign, against the parchment, which derives authority from ratification by people who came before. Judges, some elected, mediate this conflict by interpreting vague constitutional language. These ingredients make judicial review of propositions explosive. The practice exposes fundamental tensions in American law, including conflicts over when minority rights should yield to majorities, the reach of judicial review, and the optimal level of judicial independence.

In Direct Democracy and the Courts, Ken Miller, a political scientist and lawyer at Claremont McKenna College, makes an important and impressive contribution to scholarship in this field. The book blends history, institutional analysis, case law, and comprehensive data to tell the story of propositions, courts, and the constitutions that bind them. Miller does not advance a theory but instead explores a theme: the relationship between the initiative process and the judiciary. Sometimes that relationship has been contentious, manifesting the conflict between popular sovereignty and the judiciary that has simmered since the founding. Other times the relationship has been harmonious. Miller describes the times, places, and manners in which that relationship has developed.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: September 20, 2010 ; Last revised: November 2, 2012

Suggested Citation

Gilbert, Michael D., Direct Democracy, Courts, and Majority Will (March 22, 2010). Election Law Journal, Vol. 9, p. 211, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1679534

Contact Information

Michael Gilbert (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 357

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds