|
||||
|
||||
Corporate Governance and Corporate Political Activity: What Effect Will Citizens United Have on Shareholder Wealth?John C. Coates, IVHarvard Law School September 21, 2010 Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 684 Abstract: In Citizens United, the Supreme Court relaxed the ability of corporations to spend money on elections, rejecting a shareholder-protection rationale for restrictions on spending. Little research has focused on the relationship between corporate governance – shareholder rights and power – and corporate political activity. This paper explores that relationship in the S&P 500 to predict the effect of Citizens United on shareholder wealth. The paper finds that in the period 1998-2004 shareholder-friendly governance was consistently and strongly negatively related to observable political activity before and after controlling for established correlates of that activity, even in a firm fixed effects model. Political activity, in turn, is strongly negatively correlated with firm value. These findings – together with the likelihood that unobservable political activity is even more harmful to shareholder interests – imply that laws that replace the shareholder protections removed by Citizens United would be valuable to shareholders.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31 JEL Classification: D72, G32, G34, G38, K22, K23 working papers seriesDate posted: September 24, 2010 ; Last revised: December 5, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.422 seconds