Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1681060
 
 

Footnotes (226)



 


 



Extreme Policy Makeover: Re-Evaluating Current U.S.-Vietnam Relations Under the International Religious Freedom Act


Kevin V. Tu


University of New Mexico School of Law

2005

Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 771-779, 2005

Abstract:     
Following the signing of the Paris Peace Accord in 1973, the relationship between the United States and Vietnam remained essentially frozen. In 2000, the signing of the United States-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement was an epic step in the normalization of relations. In addition, the BTA was hailed as a means of effectuating positive change in the area of Vietnam’s human rights. Unfortunately, the state of religious freedom in Vietnam has deteriorated while economic ties with the United States have strengthened. Despite Vietnam’s purported respect for religious freedom, violations continue. Vietnam restricts the practice of religion, detains religious leaders, and tolerates forced renunciations of faith by local officials.

These acts violate the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Vietnam has acceded. Vietnam’s violations of the right to religious freedom have also drawn the concern of the international community. Specifically, the United States has called for improvements in Vietnam’s religious rights record, utilizing diplomatic means coupled with continued engagement in the hopes that Vietnam will voluntarily enact changes. However, this approach has failed to yield concrete progress. In 2004, the U.S. Department of State designated Vietnam a Country of Particular Concern as provided in the International Religious Freedom Act.

Because the IRFA mandates affirmative action against violators of religious freedom, the United States must abandon constructive engagement in Vietnam. Instead, the IRFA provides the framework for opposing violations under the responsible engagement doctrine. In doing so, the United States may employ economic pressure to narrowly target violators, while allowing the liberalizing effect of engagement to continue where it does not sustain violations. By fully implementing the IRFA in accordance with the tenets of responsible engagement, the United States would actively oppose violations rather than engaging Vietnam with the hope that improvements will occur. Moreover, this extreme makeover of current policy would balance the dual interests of improved religious freedom and bilateral relations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Vietnam, international law, religion, human rights

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 26, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Tu, Kevin V., Extreme Policy Makeover: Re-Evaluating Current U.S.-Vietnam Relations Under the International Religious Freedom Act (2005). Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 771-779, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1681060

Contact Information

Kevin V. Tu (Contact Author)
University of New Mexico School of Law ( email )
1117 Stanford, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87131
United States
505-277-2113 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://lawschool.unm.edu/faculty/tu/index.php
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 219
Downloads: 41
Footnotes:  226

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.437 seconds