CEO-Director Connections and Corporate Fraud
Fordham University - Schools of Business
Rutgers Business School
University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business; CAFRAL
September 23, 2010
Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper No. 2010-009
We study the propensity of firms to commit financial fraud using a sample of SEC enforcement actions from 2000 to 2006. Controlling for year effects, Fama-French 48-industry effects, and several firm characteristics, we find a significant relation between fraud probability and CEO-board connectedness. The nature of this relation depends on the institutional origin of the connection. While nonprofessional connectedness due to shared educational and non-business antecedents increase fraud probability, professional connections formed due to common prior employment decrease fraud. The positive effects of professional connectedness are pronounced only when individuals share prior service as executives. The impact of professional-connections persist after the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act while nonprofessional connections lose significance after SOX. Our results suggest that social ties matter and they can have very different effects depending on the institutional context in which the ties are formed. The results support a “collaborative board” perspective in which directors are not merely monitors but also provide advice and counsel to CEOs.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: Fraud, board of directors, corporate governance, social networks
JEL Classification: G30, G32, G34, G38
Date posted: September 24, 2010 ; Last revised: November 7, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds