Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1681741
 
 

Footnotes (184)



 


 



Limits on Hard-To-Reproduce Inventions: Process Elements and Biotechnology's Compliance with the Enablement Requirement


Dmitry Karshtedt


Stanford Law School

November 5, 2010

3 Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, No. 1, pp. 109-157 (Winter 2011)

Abstract:     
The Federal Circuit recently held in the en banc Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc. decision that a product claim that includes process elements is infringed only if the accused infringer practices process steps recited in the claim, resolving a long-standing split of authority between its panels. Since process elements now unquestionably serve as effective claim limitations in infringement analysis, it is worth examining their potential value in constraining claim scope for the purpose of complying with statutory patentability requirements. This Article advances the proposal that such limitations help to ensure that certain composition-of-matter claims in the field of biotechnology, particularly claims to biosynthetic proteins, comply with the enablement requirement of § 112 ¶ 1 of the Patent Act. For claims to materials whose behavior and utility can be highly process-dependent and whose structure cannot be fully ascertained, process limitations offer a logical solution that improves commensurability between disclosure and claim scope. This solution is consistent with established scientific norms and fits well within the highly developed enablement doctrine that requires disclosure of an adequate number of working species in order to obtain a valid generic claim.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: patent, enablement, generic claim, product claim, process claim

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 23, 2010 ; Last revised: September 1, 2014

Suggested Citation

Karshtedt, Dmitry, Limits on Hard-To-Reproduce Inventions: Process Elements and Biotechnology's Compliance with the Enablement Requirement (November 5, 2010). 3 Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, No. 1, pp. 109-157 (Winter 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1681741

Contact Information

Dmitry Karshtedt (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,189
Downloads: 138
Download Rank: 123,988
Footnotes:  184
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds