Pre-Markman Reversal Rates
David L. Schwartz
Northwestern Law School
September 24, 2010
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 43, p. 1073, 2010 (symposium issue)
The decisions in Markman v. Westview Instruments by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court shifted the responsibility for construing patent claims from jury to judge, and the Federal Circuit’s decision in Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies, Inc., adopted a de novo standard of review on appeal. These decisions were motivated in part to bring stability, predictability, and transparency to the claim construction process. The Federal Circuit’s reversal rate, which has hovered between 20 and 45 percent, has prompted calls for significant changes. These proposals are premised on the notion that the claim construction reversal rate is unduly high because of fundamental features of the appellate review process, such as the standard of review, the scope of judicial authority over claim interpretation, and the canons of claim interpretation. This Article, which is part of a symposium on the "Federal Circuit as an Institution," provides data from all Federal Circuit opinions from 1991 through 2008 to determine whether changes in the procedure for construing and reviewing claims has changed the reversal rate.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: patent, claim, claim construction, empirical, reversal rate, markman, cybor
JEL Classification: O34
Date posted: September 26, 2010 ; Last revised: December 10, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds