Efficiency Considerations in Merger Enforcement
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Alan A. Fisher
affiliation not provided to SSRN
December 1, 1983
California Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 1580-1696, December 1983
This is one of the first articles to demonstrate that the primary goal of antitrust is neither exclusively to enhance economic efficiency, nor to address any social or political factor. Rather, the overriding intent behind the merger laws was to prevent prices to purchasers from rising due to mergers (a wealth transfer concern). This is the first article to show how to analyze mergers with this goal in mind. Doing so challenges the fundamental underpinnings of Williamsonian merger analysis (which assumes mergers should be evaluated only in terms of net efficiency effects).
In this and three related articles we re-do the Williamsonian tradeoff, using price to consumers, instead of net efficiencies, as our focus. We show how a price focus would require substantially more efficiencies to justify an otherwise anticompetitive merger. We demonstrate this by calculating how large the necessary efficiency gains would have to be to prevent price increases under different market conditions. We also show that under efficiency analysis even a tiny cost savings would justify almost any merger, so a purely efficiency-based approach effectively would negate the anti-merger laws! Finally, we demonstrate that price analysis is much more predictable and easier to administer than efficiency analysis.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 118
Keywords: Antitrust, Mergers, Goals of Antitrust, Efficiency, Williamson, Price Effects, Wealth Transfers, Clayton Act, Efficiency Defense
JEL Classification: K19, K21, K29, K39, L40, L41, L49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 9, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds