|
||||
|
||||
Foreword - New Perspectives on Brady and Other Disclosure Obligations: What Really Works?Ellen YaroshefskyYeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law September 29, 2010 Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2010 Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 310 Abstract: Nearly fifty years after the Supreme Court decided Brady v. Maryland, state and federal criminal justice systems appear less than adequate in assuring that prosecutorial disclosure obligations are met. Recent high-publicity cases have highlighted failures to disclose fundamental exculpatory evidence to the defense, whether intentional or not. A November 2009 symposium at the Cardozo School of Law - New Perspectives on Brady and Other Disclosure Obligations: What Really Works? - explored these issues in a unique framework for the criminal justice system. It considered lessons from the fields of medicine, business, psychology, and policing as to their methods for managing information, optimizing performance, and insuring quality. This Foreword provides an overview of the discussions, reports, and papers from the symposium.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18 Keywords: Brady, prosecutorial disclosure, prosecutorial ethics, prosecutorial misconduct, prosecutorial review boards, criminal procedure, criminal justice Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 29, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds