Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (79)



 


 



Accession of the EU to the ECHR: Who Would Be Responsible in Strasbourg?


Tobias Lock


University of Surrey School of Law

October 1, 2010


Abstract:     
Chief among the many issues, which an accession of the EU to the ECHR, will raise, is the question of the appropriate respondent before the European Court of Human Rights in cases involving EU law. EU law is typically implemented by the Member States. Against whom should an individual address their individual complaint in a case where they argue that a violation of the ECHR can be found in EU law: the EU or the Member State? This paper discusses various options and proposals made in the wake of the negotiations, which started in July 2010. Both actions and omissions will be dealt with. It is argued that a solution must not only protect the autonomy of EU law but at the same time offer an effective remedy for the individual.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: EU, ECHR, accession, individual complaint, omissions, actions

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 3, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Lock, Tobias, Accession of the EU to the ECHR: Who Would Be Responsible in Strasbourg? (October 1, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1685785 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1685785

Contact Information

Tobias Lock (Contact Author)
University of Surrey School of Law ( email )
University of Surrey
Austin Pearse
Guildford, GU2 7XH
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.surrey.ac.uk/law/people/tobias_lock/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,604
Downloads: 950
Download Rank: 10,056
Footnotes:  79

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds