Emergence and Future of Central Counterparties
52 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2010
Date Written: September 1, 2010
Abstract
The authors explain why central counterparties (CCPs) emerged historically. With standardized contracts, it is optimal to insure counterparty risk by clearing those contracts through a CCP that uses novation and mutualization. As netting is not essential for these services, it does not explain why CCPs exist. In over-the-counter markets, as contracts are customized and not fungible, a CCP cannot fully guarantee contract performance. Still, a CCP can help: As bargaining leads to an inefficient allocation of default risk relative to the gains from customization, a transfer scheme is needed. A CCP can implement it by offering partial insurance for customized contracts.
Keywords: Counterparty Risk, Novation, Mutualization, Over-the-counter Markets, Customized Financial Contracts
JEL Classification: G2, G13, D53, D82
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Does a Central Clearing Counterparty Reduce Counterparty Risk?
By Darrell Duffie and Haoxiang Zhu
-
Credit Default Swaps and the Empty Creditor Problem
By Patrick Bolton and Martin Oehmke
-
The Bear's Lair: Indexed Credit Default Swaps and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
By Richard Stanton and Nancy Wallace
-
One Share-One Vote is Unenforceable and Sub-Optimal
By Avner Kalay and Shagun Pant