|
||||
|
||||
Reevaluating Standardized Insurance PoliciesDaniel SchwarczUniversity of Minnesota Law School October 5, 2010 University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 78, p. 1263, 2011 Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-65 Abstract: This Article empirically debunks the common claim that homeowners insurance policies do not vary across different insurance carriers. It demonstrates that different carriers' homeowners policies differ radically with respect to numerous important coverage provisions. It also reports that a substantial majority of these deviations produce decreases in the amount of coverage relative to the presumptive industry standard, though some deviations increase coverage. Additionally, the Article describes the surprising absence of any mechanisms by which even informed and vigilant consumers could comparison shop among carriers on the basis of differences in coverage. It closes by reviewing various regulatory and judicial options for responding to this lack of transparency in homeowners insurance markets. It also considers the broader theoretical implications of the findings for regulatory theory and scholarship on standardized form contracts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 88 Keywords: Homeowners insurance, insurance, personal lines, transparency, state regulation, standard form contracts Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 6, 2010 ; Last revised: November 29, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.453 seconds