Reevaluating Standardized Insurance Policies
University of Minnesota Law School
October 5, 2010
University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 78, p. 1263, 2011
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-65
This Article empirically debunks the common claim that homeowners insurance policies do not vary across different insurance carriers. It demonstrates that different carriers' homeowners policies differ radically with respect to numerous important coverage provisions. It also reports that a substantial majority of these deviations produce decreases in the amount of coverage relative to the presumptive industry standard, though some deviations increase coverage. Additionally, the Article describes the surprising absence of any mechanisms by which even informed and vigilant consumers could comparison shop among carriers on the basis of differences in coverage. It closes by reviewing various regulatory and judicial options for responding to this lack of transparency in homeowners insurance markets. It also considers the broader theoretical implications of the findings for regulatory theory and scholarship on standardized form contracts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 88
Keywords: Homeowners insurance, insurance, personal lines, transparency, state regulation, standard form contracts
Date posted: October 6, 2010 ; Last revised: November 29, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.500 seconds