Union Salts as Administrative Private Attorneys General
Michael C. Duff
University of Wyoming College of Law
October 7, 2010
Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, Vol. 32, Spring 2011
The legitimacy of union salting campaigns has been debated frequently and bitterly over the last several years. Salts, the agents of these campaigns, are professional union organizers who apply for, and sometimes obtain – often surreptitiously – employment with non-union employers in furtherance of union objectives. Although recent decisions of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), under the influence of the W. Bush administration, have erected administrative and legal roadblocks to the conduct of salting campaigns, it is likely that the “Obama Board” will revisit the issues surrounding them. This article argues that salts have served a legitimate function by exposing unlawful, anti-union employment practices. Developing more fully a fleeting discussion in a recent NLRB case, the article explores whether salts’ aggressive charge filing activity at the NLRB represents a permissible form of administrative private attorney general mechanism in aid of increased enforcement of the NLRA. Answering the question in the affirmative, the article contends that the NLRB should not reject salting activity on “moral” grounds, or based upon an overly restrictive view of the nature of union organizing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: salting, union organizing, private attorneys general, administrative enforcement
JEL Classification: J50, J51, J52, J53, J58, J59, J70, J71, J78, K31, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 9, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.329 seconds