Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1690735
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (192)



 


 



Strategic Globalization: International Law as an Extension of Domestic Political Conflict


Jide Nzelibe


Northwestern University - School of Law

October 11, 2010

Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-59

Abstract:     
Traditional accounts in both the international law and international relations literature largely assume that great powers like the United States enter into international legal commitments in order to resolve global cooperative problems or to advance objective state interests. Contrary to these accounts, this Article suggests that an incumbent regime (or partisan elites within the regime) may often seek to use international legal commitments to overcome domestic obstacles to their narrow policy and electoral objectives. In this picture, an incumbent regime may deploy international law to expand the geographical scope of political conflict across borders in order to isolate the domestic political opposition and increase the influence of foreign groups or governments sympathetic to the regime’s objectives. The political opposition may in turn seek to exploit the existence of a fragmented system of domestic institutions to thwart both the adoption and enforcement of any international law that strengthens the ruling regime and weaken its own position. Finally, this Article sketches a framework for predicting when distributive international legal commitments are likely to be sustainable across electoral cycles and when they are not. More specifically, the framework suggests that an international legal commitment is likely to be electorally sustainable when the veil of ignorance underlying the commitment is sufficiently thick; in other words, an international commitment entered into by a partisan regime has more staying power if it produces policy outcomes that are favored by some salient groups in the political opposition. The Article uses examples from the United States experience with human rights and international trade to illustrate how partisan dynamics between Republicans and Democrats has helped spawn and restrict the scope of international legal commitments.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: international law, constitutional law, foreign relations, strategic behavior

JEL Classification: K19, K33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 12, 2010 ; Last revised: October 29, 2010

Suggested Citation

Nzelibe, Jide, Strategic Globalization: International Law as an Extension of Domestic Political Conflict (October 11, 2010). Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-59. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1690735

Contact Information

Jide Nzelibe (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 886
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 118,581
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  192

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.282 seconds