Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1691371
 
 

Footnotes (78)



 


 



Religious Freedom and its Enemies, or Why the Smith Decision may be a Greater Loss Now than it was Then


Steven Douglas Smith


University of San Diego School of Law

October 12, 2010

Cardozo Law Review, Forthcoming
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 10-037

Abstract:     
Threats to religious freedom change over time. In the early modern period, the dominant threat was imposed religious orthodoxy. Although the First Amendment religion clauses were a good response to this threat, by the time they were adopted the threat had already receded, to be replaced by a different challenge that we might call democratic disregard. The Sherbert “compelling interest” test was a plausible response to that newer threat, except that by the time Sherbert was decided the problem of democratic disregard had likewise declined. Consequently, the doctrine had little occasion for application, and Smith’s rejection of Sherbert was no big deal at the time. Today, though, the most serious threat to religious freedom comes from the cultural and legal ascendency of secular egalitarianism – a development that in many ways parallels the classical phenomenon of imposed religious orthodoxy. The Sherbert doctrine, if it were still in force, might be of some help in protecting religious freedom against the demands of secular egalitarianism. Hence, Smith’s repudiation of Sherbert is a more serious loss now than it was at the time.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Freedom of Religion, Constitutional Law, First Amendment

JEL Classification: K10

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 13, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Smith, Steven Douglas, Religious Freedom and its Enemies, or Why the Smith Decision may be a Greater Loss Now than it was Then (October 12, 2010). Cardozo Law Review, Forthcoming; San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 10-037. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1691371

Contact Information

Steven Douglas Smith (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-7969 (Phone)
619-260-2492 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 660
Downloads: 107
Download Rank: 153,781
Footnotes:  78
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds