Citations (2)


Footnotes (204)



Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda or Indifference?

Adam C. Pritchard

University of Michigan Law School

August 13, 2011

U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 10-026

Historically, securities law has not been a high priority for the Supreme Court. The first six years of the Roberts Court, however, suggest an upsurge of interest in the federal securities laws. The Roberts Court's average of two cases per year marks a significant increase from the Rehnquist Court’s average. These numbers are deceptive. Analysis of the opinions deciding these cases – and more importantly, the issues debated by the justices – suggests that the Court is not interested in the substance of the securities laws or the policies that animate them. Instead, securities law serves as a backdrop for debates over statutory interpretation and the relationship of the judiciary to the administrative state. Only in the area of securities class actions is there an inkling of engagement with the specific subject matter. Notwithstanding charges that the Roberts Court is “pro business,” the Court has not charted a consistent course favoring corporate defendants. Instead, the Court has demonstrated a bias toward the status quo, resisting attempts to both restrict and expand – the reach of Rule 10b-5 class actions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts, securities regulation

JEL Classification: K22

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 14, 2010 ; Last revised: July 16, 2016

Suggested Citation

Pritchard, Adam C., Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda or Indifference? (August 13, 2011). U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 10-026. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1691683 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1691683

Contact Information

Adam C. Pritchard (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-647-4048 (Phone)
734-647-7349 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 815
Downloads: 125
Download Rank: 170,844
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  204

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds