|
||||
|
||||
How Companies Influence Elections - Political Campaign Spending Patterns and Oversight at America’s Largest CompaniesHeidi WelshSustainable Investments Institute (Si2) Robin YoungSustainable Investments Institute (Si2) October 14, 2010 Abstract: Investor activists have waged a campaign to increase corporate political spending disclosure and board oversight since 2004, through shareholder resolutions filed for consideration at corporate annual meetings. In 2010, average support for these resolutions reached 30 percent - an unusually high level for dissident proposals. This report examines corporate political spending governance practices at S&P 500 companies, exploring the extent to which they conform to suggested best practices outlined in a handbook released in November 2010 by the Conference Board and the Center for Political Accountability, a Washington, DC-based based advocacy group that has led the disclosure campaign. The study finds that board oversight and voluntary spending disclosure to investors remains limited. Further, companies rarely reveal policies and practices relating to "independent expenditures" from the corporate treasury, an avenue for political spending that was expanded substantially by the Citizens United decision.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 84 Keywords: Political Contributions, Campaign Finance, Citizens United JEL Classification: G3, G38, K2, K22, D72, G32, G38 working papers seriesDate posted: October 16, 2010 ; Last revised: November 5, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.563 seconds